2012: a dangerous year in US-China relations
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPr1x743QzfdO-UHW5b500G8-zDroe09pI6YfK2_vrREhNwkNPfvOHNLZpPWy7ooM6fL-LJTAmdU0ZZrbDgX4ugrPQee2MJDX8F-sF6scKGXzNZ9qGy421Y_Qg1PtJ3hfUVMp755SS-tQ/s1600/Chinese-Army-600x350.jpg)
2011-12-21 (China Military News cited from atimes.com and by Peter Lee) --The year 2011 has been a tough one for Sino-United States ties. And 2012 does not look like it's going to be a good year either, with a presidential election year in the United States. For both the Democratic and Republican parties, bashing the Chinese economic, military and freedom-averse menace will probably be a campaign-trail staple.
Lunch-pail issues - protectionism and the undervalued yuan - will focus disapproving US eyes.
Tensions will also be exacerbated by the Barack Obama administration's "return to Asia" - a return to proactive containment of China - and the temptation to apply dangerous and destabilizing new doctrine, preventive diplomacy, to China.
The potential for friction certainly exists.
China, as it approaches a leadership transition, wants to avoid friction. However, the United States appears to welcome it and, in the election year, might even incite it.
The US, under the Obama administration and thanks in large part to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's team at the State Department, has been quite adept in putting China at a geopolitical disadvantage in Europe, Africa and Asia.
Image of Queshan-2009 Military Drill
Harnessing Asia's growth and dynamism is central to American economic and strategic interests ... broader commitment to elevate economic statecraft as a pillar of American foreign policy. Increasingly, economic progress depends on strong diplomatic ties, and diplomatic progress depends on strong economic ties. And naturally, a focus on promoting American prosperity means a greater focus on trade and economic openness in the Asia-Pacific.
In any event, the media are happy to stir the geopolitical pot on America's behalf.
In quick succession in December, the Western press hyped two dubious stories about China's military posture.
The first, the Karber/Georgetown report aka "Tunnelgate", rehashed old information in the public domain and combined it with wishful thinking disguised as speculation to raise the specter of a previously unknown underground arsenal of Chinese nuclear missiles.
Comments